Ethics Policy

Publishing an article in RADEN INTAN: Proceedings on Family and Humanity we uphold the highest ethical standards when producing journal content. It is essential that all who participate in developing the journal - authors, reviewers, editors and publishers - commit to these standards. Peer review is essential in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on expected standards of ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public. Postgraduate Program of Raden Intan State Islamic University Lampung, Indonesia as the publisher takes the duty of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Publishing Decision

RADEN INTAN: Proceedings on Family and Humanity Postgraduate Program of Raden Intan Lampung State Islamic University (UIN) is responsible for deciding which articles to publish. The validity of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always be the basis of the decision. The editor may be guided by the journal's editorial board policy and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making these decisions.

Fair Play  

The editors at all times evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff should not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosures and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in the editors' own research without the written consent of the authors.

REVIEWER DUTIES

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving the manuscript.

Timeliness

Any reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in the manuscript or knows that a prompt review is not possible should inform the editor and excuse himself/herself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts accepted for review should be treated as confidential documents. Manuscripts should not be shown or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.

Objectivity Standard

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of authors is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any assertion that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Reviewers should also bring to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published manuscripts of which they are personally aware.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts that have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with authors, companies, or institutions associated with the manuscript.

DUTIES OF THE AUTHOR

Reporting Standards

Authors of original research reports must present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be accurately represented in the paper. The paper should contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or deliberately inaccurate statements constitute unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that they have written a wholly original piece of work, and if the author uses the work and/or words of others, these have been appropriately cited or quoted. 

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should generally not publish a manuscript describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Paper Authorship

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the reported research. All persons who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. If others participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the manuscript and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and approved its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for this project must be disclosed.

Fundamental Errors in Published Work

When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his or her own published work, the author is obligated to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the manuscript.